Dr. Vanessa Chishti from Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Law School presented his research entitled ‘Producing Paradise: Kashmir’s Commodity Economy and the Politics of Representation, c. 1830-1930’ at the Sociological Research Colloquium.
When: Friday, 22nd September 2017 at 3:00 p.m.
Where: Seminar Room (First Floor), Department of Sociology, University of Delhi
Abstract
This paper is a part of a larger project on marriage in Arya Samaj, a ‘brand of reinterpreted and modern Hinduism’ (Jones 1976) founded by Dayanand Saraswati in late 19th century. The paper will draw from one major section of this work which is concerned with the prominent role of the Arya Samaj in the solemnization of marriages in Indian society. Arya Samaj is well known as the provider of quick and easy marriage services, particularly for those lacking familial consent. But although the Arya Samaj has been a harbinger of transgressive unions for a while now, its role in conducting such marriages is also increasingly attracting judicial scrutiny. Setting the Arya Samaj marriage services in a broad legal historical context, in this paper I wish to highlight the limits and capacities of the ambiguous legal space occupied by marriage services offered by the institutions functioning in the name of Arya Samaj, which is evident in the restrictions and regulations it is increasingly encountering and adopting as well.
Other Research Colloquiums
- FRIDAY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM: 3:00 PM 1 December 2023. Manish Jain: ‘The Postcolonial Citizen of NEP 2020’
- FRIDAY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM: 3:00 PM 24 November 2023. Mekhala Krishnamurthy: ‘Mandi Acts and Farm Laws: Making Sense of Regulatory Life in India’s Agricultural Markets’
- FRIDAY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM: 3:00 PM 10 November 2023. Roma Chatterji: ‘The Superhero Image and Ravana Mythology’
- FRIDAY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM: 3:00 PM 3 November 2023. Mallika Shakya: ‘Beyond Matters: Women’s Shifting Roles in Nepal’s Neo-liberal Garment Industry’
- FRIDAY RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM: 3:00 PM 27 October 2023. Hanna Kim: ‘Fieldworkers, Interlocuters and Others: Thinking through the Limits of Ethnography’